Skip to content
Adhiwakta logo — scales of justice in a shield cradled by a handAdhiwakta
Ask

Cheque bounce: NI Act Section 138 criminal complaint vs civil recovery / summary suit (Order 37) — which path? (2026)

When to use a criminal complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 versus a civil suit for recovery (including a summary suit under Order XXXVII CPC): timelines (30-day notice, 15-day payment, complaint within one month of cause of action), that both can run together, Lok Adalat settlement, and civil limitation. Educational only — not legal advice. Use our free cheque-bounce deadline calculator if you need to estimate dates.

Send your question on WhatsApp

WhatsApp opens with your question already written. You just tap send.

Two different remedies for the same unpaid cheque

A dishonoured cheque can support (1) a criminal complaint under Section 138 of the NI Act — punishable with imprisonment up to two years, or fine up to twice the cheque amount, or both — and (2) a civil suit to recover the debt or liability the cheque represented. Criminal proceedings punish the drawer for the statutory offence; a civil suit aims at a money decree. You can pursue both; one does not automatically bar the other, though courts may note parallel proceedings when fixing sentence or instalments.

Section 138 criminal track — the statutory clock

Typical conditions: the cheque was issued for a legally enforceable debt or liability; presented within its validity (RBI: usually three months from the date on the cheque); returned unpaid for insufficiency of funds or similar reasons covered by s. 138; the payee sent a written demand notice within 30 days of receiving the bank’s return memo; the drawer failed to pay within 15 days of receiving that notice; and the complaint is filed within one month of the date when the cause of action arose (the day after those 15 days end) — NI Act ss. 138(b)–(c) and 142(1)(b). Our free tool at /tools/cheque-bounce-calculator helps estimate these dates from your memo and notice dates. The complaint lies before the Magistrate with jurisdiction under s. 142 (as amended).

Is your situation a little different? Send your question on WhatsApp.

Write in Hindi or English · general guidance, not legal advice

Ask on WhatsApp

Civil recovery and summary suit (Order 37 CPC)

A civil suit seeks a decree for the amount due (cheque amount, interest, costs as claimed). Where the claim is based on a negotiable instrument, many plaintiffs use the summary procedure under Order XXXVII of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — the defendant needs leave to defend, which can speed up judgment if there is no substantial defence. Ordinary money suits are also available. Limitation for a suit on a cheque/debt is generally three years under the Limitation Act, 1963 (commonly Article 19 or related articles depending on how the claim is framed) — estimate with our limitation calculator. Court fee and territorial jurisdiction follow the CPC and State Court Fees Acts.

Which path people commonly choose — and why both

Section 138 is often used for pressure and settlement because of the criminal consequence and relatively short timelines; civil suit is used when the main goal is a recoverable decree, attachment, or when s. 138 timelines were missed. If the notice or complaint window for s. 138 has gone, civil recovery may still be open within limitation. If both clocks are alive, many complainants file s. 138 and keep a civil option ready — strategy depends on facts, amount, and the drawer’s solvency. Compounding of s. 138 offences is allowed (s. 147 NI Act); Lok Adalats frequently settle cheque-bounce matters.

Lok Adalat and settlement

Pending and pre-litigation cheque-bounce disputes are commonly listed in National and regular Lok Adalats. An award is final like a civil decree (Legal Services Authorities Act s. 21). Settlement can cover both the criminal complaint (by compounding/withdrawal as the court allows) and the civil claim. See our Lok Adalat guide.

Documents to keep ready

Original cheque and bank return memo; proof of presentation; copy of the demand notice with postal/courier proof of service or acknowledgment; calculation of amounts; account statements showing the debt; any reply from the drawer; and ID proof. For civil suit, also the agreement, invoices or loan papers that show the underlying liability.

What this guide is not

It does not replace case-specific advice. Wrong jurisdiction, a defective notice, or a stale complaint can defeat a s. 138 case even when the cheque bounced. Our separate cheque-bounce recovery guide covers the s. 138 process in more detail.

How Adhiwakta can help

We do not draft notices, file complaints or suits, or negotiate settlements. Adhiwakta is a facilitation platform, not a law firm. We do not file cases, appear before any authority, or promise any result. Use Ask Adhiwakta to describe your situation for general guidance from an independent advocate, or start with the AI helper to organise your facts and papers. Educational only — not formal legal advice.

Frequently asked questions

Can I file both Section 138 and a civil recovery suit?
Yes. A criminal complaint under NI Act s. 138 and a civil suit for the debt can proceed in parallel. They serve different purposes — punishment/settlement pressure versus a money decree.
What are the Section 138 notice and complaint deadlines?
Demand notice within 30 days of the bank return memo; drawer has 15 days from receipt of notice to pay; complaint within one month of the cause of action (the day after those 15 days). Use /tools/cheque-bounce-calculator to estimate dates.
What is a summary suit under Order 37 CPC?
Order XXXVII CPC provides a faster civil procedure for claims on negotiable instruments and certain other debts. The defendant needs leave to defend; if leave is refused, judgment can follow more quickly than in an ordinary suit.
What if I missed the Section 138 timeline?
A late s. 138 complaint is usually not maintainable. A civil recovery suit may still be available within the Limitation Act period (commonly three years for money claims — confirm the exact article for your facts).
Can cheque bounce cases go to Lok Adalat?
Yes. Cheque-bounce matters are commonly settled in Lok Adalats; the award is final like a civil decree. Section 138 offences are also compoundable under s. 147 of the NI Act.

Share Adhiwakta with someone who needs it

Send this page on WhatsApp — legal information in Hindi & English.

Ask on WhatsAppForm